Soil-conservation effect of intercrops in silage maize
نویسندگان
چکیده
More than 50% of agricultural land is threatened by water erosion in the Czech Republic. With respect to soil erosion, maize (Zea mays L.) belongs most problematic crops; one possibilities increase protection against intercropping. In this study, we attempted find out effects individual intercrops and their mixtures (sown 4–6 weeks after sowing maize) or a mixed culture (maize plus lupine) on losses surface runoff period 2019–2021. The study was realised sugar beet growing region (Haplic Luvisol); field rainfall simulator used. From used variants with Lolium perenne L., Trifolium repens Vicia villosa Roth, multiflorum Lam., Festuca arundinacea Schreb., Triticum aestivum L. mixture (Vicia hybrid diploid), perenne, multiflorum, diploid, established between rows (hybrid maize, cultivar Walterinio) May 27, were efficient case both reductions year 2019. For example, mostly reduced similar (or higher) compared control without any intercrop). variant had higher similar) loss values (compared control); variant, lower control. We proved our hypothesis regards reduction perenne. results from years 2020 (the Secale cereale incarnatum Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth., incarnatum, pannonica Crantz) 2021 – early sowing, cereale, tanacetifolia, = Lupinus albus showed (Lolium incarnatum), (in 2020) incarnatum) albus) (2021) positive effect when > 2 m < 1 m. obtained 2019–2021 grasses decreasing mixtures.
منابع مشابه
The potential of forage±maize intercrops in ruminant nutrition
Studies at the University of Reading (UK) compared silage quality, feed intake and digestibility of maize silage with maize±sun ̄ower (MS), maize±kale (MK) and maize±runner bean (MRB) silage, when sun ̄owers, kale and runner beans represented 26, 7 and 16% of total silage dry matter (DM). All intercrop silages had higher crude protein values (MS, 137 g kgÿ1, MRB, 120 g kgÿ1, MK, 105 g kgÿ1) than ...
متن کاملMaize silage for dairy cows
This paper reviews the use of maize silage in pastoral dairying systems in New Zealand. The evolution of dairying systems to make profitable use of maize silage and other supplementary feeds has occurred during the last decade in conjunction with an increased use of maize silage. When used within recommended levels of feeding, maize silage provides a low cost source of starch and fibre which co...
متن کاملEffect of maize silage to grass silage ratio and feed particle size on ruminal fermentation in vitro.
The effect of the forage source on ruminal fermentation in vitro was investigated for fine (F) and coarse (C) milled diets, using a modified Hohenheim gas production test and a semi-continuous rumen simulation technique (Rusitec). It was hypothesised that the replacement of maize silage by grass silage might lead to associative effects and that interactions related to particle size variation co...
متن کاملEffect of replacing grass silage with maize silage in the diet on bovine milk fatty acid composition.
Even though extensive research has examined the role of nutrition on milk fat composition, there is less information on the impact of forages on milk fatty acid (FA) composition. In the current study, the effect of replacing grass silage (GS) with maize silage (MS) as part of a total mixed ration on animal performance and milk FA composition was examined using eight multiparous mid-lactation co...
متن کاملBiogas Production from Maize Grains and Maize Silage
The main objective of this work was anaerobic digestion of maize grains and maize silage and biogas production from these crops. Maize grains were treated using one-stage and two-stage anaerobic techniques; using hydrolysis and acidification as the first stage and methanogenesis as the second stage. Processing nonacidified maize grains in an anaerobic reactor is more stable, though the anaerobi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Soil and Water Research
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1801-5395', '1805-9384']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/36/2022-swr